Women Leave Rio+20 Motivated to Galvanize Sustainability Around Family Planning and Reproductive Rights



Rio ProtestThere is a direct correlation between access to voluntary family planning, women’s empowerment and environmental sustainability. And though the official delegates to last week’s “Earth Summit” tried to water it down, thousands of grassroots activists (left) made it one of the biggest issues to rock Rio+20, as the event was also called.

Why? Because ensuring that women have full reproductive rights creates one of the most desirable “two-fers” on the planet. Complete access to voluntary family planning is among the quickest, simplest, and most affordable ways to improve women’s quality of life. It is also one of the most direct, immediate and cost-effective ways to reduce climate change. In fact, studies show that slowing population growth by giving women access to the contraception they already want could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by between 8 and 15 percent [PDF] — roughly equivalent to ending all tropical deforestation.

Mom childWomen took these issues to Rio because more than 200 million women in the U.S. and around the world cannot choose whether or when to have a baby, simply because they don’t have access to voluntary family planning. Groups like the Global Fund for Women and International Planned Parenthood Federation spent several days last week making their case, button-holing delegates, meeting with celebrities, blogging and Tweeting, and protesting in the streets.

In the end, as Grist reported, the Rio+20 outcome document – though 49 pages long and consisting of 23,917 words – mentions women in less than 0.01 percent of the entire text. And only two of the 283 sections addressed women’s needs for family planning. Of the seven priority areas of discussion at the summit, none included language endorsing the idea that access to contraception is a basic human right. In fact, language to that effect was specifically removed from earlier drafts of Earth Summit recommendations, primarily at the insistence of the Vatican, which interprets endorsement of reproductive “rights” as endorsement of abortion.

Hillary rio 2This did not sit well with Hillary Rodham Clinton, the U.S. Secretary of State who led America’s official summit delegation. “Women must be empowered to make decisions on whether and when to have children" if the world is to attain agreed-upon sustainable development goals,"  she said.

Peggy Clark, the executive vice president for policy programs at the Aspen Institute, concurred. "Removing references to reproductive health from the outcome document was "an unacceptable step backward that erases decades of global commitments," she said. "The ability to choose the number, spacing and timing of children is not a luxury. It is a basic human right, one that has already been affirmed by the world community at the Cairo and Beijing conferences."

Dr. Carmen Barroso, Regional Director of the International Planned Parenthood Federation/Western Division, pointed out that there is “no recognition [in the outcome document] of the intersection between population dynamics, reproductive health and rights and sustainable development.”

“Overall, it was disheartening to say the least to see the lack of recognition of women’s sexual and reproductive rights and the critical role women’s equality plays in ensuring sustainable development,” she said. “It bears repeating time and time again that as long as women don’t have sustainable lives, there will not be, and cannot be, global sustainability.”

Nevertheless, activists who left Rio seem more determined than ever to secure reproductive rights for all women and to draw a bright line between voluntary contraception and sustainability.

"We will keep organizing well beyond the confines of this conference. There are tens of thousands of us! Collectively we can make a lot of noise, change minds and policy. It’s kind of like our version of “occupy.” We’re going to occupy Rio beyond 20,” declared Musimbi Kanyoro, CEO and President of the Global Fund for Women.

 

RELATED POSTS:

Earth Summit Delegates Refuse to Recognize Women's Reproductive Rights

At Rio+20, Women Focus on Reproductive Rights and Sustainability

Why Climate Change Matters to Women

 

 

, , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to Women Leave Rio+20 Motivated to Galvanize Sustainability Around Family Planning and Reproductive Rights

  1. Joyness Sparkles June 27, 2012 at 8:31 am #

    I don’t agree with the Reproductive Rights issue. Women are human and not gods. I think it is terrible that people should have to bow down and worship the female just becuase her anatomy is different. Some cultures are different and children mean more to other cultures than they do to Western culture. In Western culture, children are treated like pets. In other cultures children are essential to their survival, they do not think the way Westerners do. Why are we imposing our beliefs on other cultures?
    I see the push for “reproductive rights” as very threatening. I know that there are people who in the future will pass laws just like in China where women can be pulled off the street and be forced into an abortion and if the baby is at all defective people will be able to trash the baby without the parents permission. The same people that are talking “choice” now will talk “control” later. History repeats itself.
    Which brings me to another problem. No one ever thinks about if the man wanted the baby. People just gleefully jump for joy when a woman has an abortion and never stops to ask…how does the father feel about it? Men have feelings too.

  2. Diane MacEachern July 5, 2012 at 10:17 am #

    Thank you for your comments. I don’t think people “gleefully jump for joy when a woman has an abortion.” With more reproductive rights, in fact, the number of abortions will drop as women and men both access voluntary contraception.

  3. gio July 6, 2012 at 10:17 am #

    good information

  4. solar panel kits home December 10, 2012 at 6:51 am #

    Women really know that if they will not practice family planning, they will put their family at risk. Thanks to those people who listened to their cry and took actions.

Leave a Reply

Go Green. Save Money. Guaranteed!

Save $5,070 THIS YEAR With Our FREE Go Green, Save Money Guide

Don't worry! We protect your privacy.

Close this popup

  • Get the Greener, Cleaner, Healthier Life You Want & Save $$$ Doing It - Guaranteed!